Pilots, Patdowns, and Rest Rules

Just wanted to put my two cents in on two aviation topics that are currently in the news: “naked body scanners” at TSA security screenings, and FAA reform of pilot rest rules.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010 is National Opt-Out Day. It is an awareness campaign, cleverly planned for the busiest travel day of the year, to get the attention of lawmakers. Travelers are encouraged to opt-out of Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT, or “naked body scanners“) and request an enhanced manual pat-down. According the the official website:

It’s the day ordinary citizens stand up for their rights, stand up for liberty, and protest the federal government’s desire to virtually strip us naked or submit to an “enhanced pat down” that touches people’s breasts and genitals in an aggressive manner.  You should never have to explain to your children, “Remember that no stranger can touch or see your private area, unless it’s a government employee, then it’s OK.”

The goal of National Opt Out Day is to send a message to our lawmakers that we demand change.  We have a right to privacy and buying a plane ticket should not mean that we’re guilty until proven innocent.  This day is needed because many people do not understand what they consent to when choosing to fly.

It’s more than just a traveler issue for me, it’s an issue of common sense. Pilots and other crew members are subjected to security searches day after day, and are exposed to potentially harmful radiation levels. Many airline unions have encouraged pilots to refuse the AIT scanners and request the pat-down everytime. Unfortunately, I don’t have the highest opinion of many TSA agents…many are young, inexperienced, and exploit the power trip that their uniform affords them. If my husband’s junk is going to be manually examined, I’d prefer it not to be done by a TSA agent. My friend Sam, a regional captain, wrote an excellent post on security silliness required for pilots. Why are crew members practically strip-searched when they have the greatest weapon at their disposal (the airplane), should they choose to cause a disaster? Will fingernail clippers or a shampoo bottle over 3.4 ounces be more dangerous? It just doesn’t make sense.

The other issue under discussion is regarding the FAA’s proposed Flight Time/Duty Time requirements. These new rules allow a reduction in the amount of hours a pilot may have on the ground, while increasing the total hours they may be on duty. Sully Sullenberger, the captain of the “Miracle on the Hudson,” is encouraging the traveling public to  lobby to have the proposed rules revised for safety. Please watch the following video, and visit the Coalition of Airline Pilot Association website to create letters to send to your local government officials.

Important Message From Captain Sully Sullenberger

Help keep the friendly skies safe, one pilot at a time!

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention www.cuteculturechick.com – The Culture-Loving Pilot Wife » Blog Archive » Pilots, Patdowns, and Rest Rules -- Topsy.com()

  • Yes, the giant ax in the cockpit and the thousands of pounds of jet fuel they have at their disposal seem a littlemore menacing. Hopefully this will push Crewpass through finally.

  • While i certainly don’t want someone seeing me nakies (other than my husband), I also don’t want anyone touching the few parts of me that have never seen the light of day. Can I opt out of both?

  • Came over to your site to check it out after meeting you at Bloggy Bootcamp on Saturday. Had a great time and don’t forget to keep in touch about medical admin/billing/coding etc. Let me know when you’re sitting the CPC exam.

    My 2 cents worth is this: Do I choose to be seen naked everytime I fly? Do I want my kids to be exposed as well? My answer is no. Do I want myself or them patted down either? No. But do I want some idiot to get on the plane with the tools that he/she needs to take my family’s life? An emphatic no! The reality is that times have changed and technology (the ability to cause havoc as well as catch it before it happens) along with it. The authorities need to keep up with the sick buggars out there and do it as efficiently and effectively as possible. I’ll do what I need to do to keep my family safe and trust me, after those who will monitor the screens see the first 10,000 naked bodies the novelty will wear off.

  • I’m just fine with the pat downs. Some feel that children shouldn’t be subjected but as soon as we alter there it will open a hole for exploitation. I for one am fine with being x-rayed or examined. I need to get from point A to B safely. I cannot afford any alternatives.

  • Protection is vital but there are glaring gaps within the effectiveness of specific air-ports. Things accidently get left in handbags and so on and never found by screeners in addition to big mistakes that might cost us our lives! We now have political figures requesting restrictions on the number of individuals that receive pat downs and scans, that will achieves nothing! It ought to be all or zero! It all seems to me the previous approach was working, so why did they change it out!

  • Safety is vital but there are obvious gaps in the efficiency of specific air-ports. Objects mistakenly get left inside handbags etc but not found by screeners as well as other big mistakes that might ended up costing our lives! We’ve got political figures asking for restrictions on how many individuals that receive pat downs and tests, which accomplishes next to nothing! It should be all or not one! It seems to me the previous approach had been working, for what reason did individuals change it out!

%d bloggers like this: